I have edited the issue to suggest a solution. @gigincg please review

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4678#issuecomment-1871996286

@Ashesh3 lets close this by next release. Please mark as P1

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6676#issuecomment-1849940843

@nihal467 why does the implementation look nothing like the images above? @konavivekramakrishna

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6517#issuecomment-1827644345

Agreed. Let us give it to the district admin as well. NOT the Readonly or lab admin

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6716#issuecomment-1827346340

> * [ ] We can only assign one user to a patient; having multiple users assigned to a patient is not currently feasible. @aparnacoronasafe > > _Discussion note on 27/11/2023 - Engineering Call_ Is it 1 nurse & 1 doctor? Or just 1 nurse/doctor

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6276#issuecomment-1827344795

@xakep8 If you go to log update, Round Type, currently we have two options. **Normal**- When they select normal log update, they only fill out the one form that appears with vitals and a few other fields. **Critical Care**- When this is selected, the log update form leads to another more lengthy critical care forms. In this new type "Telemedicine" round type, we will go with the same form as in "Normal" round type. Is it clear?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6676#issuecomment-1827329752

@xakep8 I have updated the issue a little. Let me know if you have any confusion.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6676#issuecomment-1820324649

@GokulramGHV Please create a new field for "Instruction on titration" and retain "Notes" as well.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6432#issuecomment-1784449917

@gigincg @rithviknishad @GokulramGHV Why I insist on having "start dose and target dose" and NOT min dose and max dose is because : Titration is of 2 kinds. Up-titration and down-titration. Up-titration is when medicine dosage is slowly increased, and down-titration is when patient is being veined off a medication. In the former, the user is moving dosage from min to max, while in the later the reverse. Hence for users indicating dosage as Min and max may be confusing. To know more on Drug Titration, you may refer to the scientific paper; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7967860/

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6432#issuecomment-1778890775

@nihal467 Urgent

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6393#issuecomment-1748847796

@GokulramGHV I discussed with @bodhish Notification will be hard to deploy. Lets skip notification for now

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6241#issuecomment-1737520344

> When will I expect the changes to take place? A date will be updated post discussion @SeyiesilieChadi

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6340#issuecomment-1733490667

@rithviknishad @Ashesh3 I know this was discussed, but could we revisit it? It is a valid ask. Adjustment of dosage and frequency of medication is very common in ICUs @gigincg

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6340#issuecomment-1733489671

- [ ] Rename the field from "Status during consultation" to "Route to Facility" - [ ] Rename "Outpatient (walk-in)" to "Outpatient/Emergency Room" - [ ] Change options to below: from top to bottom, show: - Outpatient/Emergency Room - Referred from another facility - Internal Transfer within facility - [ ] Migrate and map existing Data: - All brought dead is merged with "Outpatient/Emergency Room" (since any new patient, alive or dead is brought to hospital through ER) - Transfer from ward and transfer from ICU to be merged into "Internal Transfer within facility" - Referred from other hospital changes to "Referred from another facility" - [ ] If "Referred from another facility" is selected, Field for - "Name of referring doctor" <Short text field> - non mandatory - "Name of referring facility" <Short text field> - Mandatory - "Date and Time of admission to ICU"- <Date, time picker>- date to me mandatory, time, non-mandatory - [ ] If "Internal Transfer within the facility" is selected, - Date of admission to this facility <Date picker> - Mandatory - "Date and Time of admission to ICU"- <Date, time picker>- date to me mandatory, time, non-mandatory - Name of Ward/ICU the patient is shifted from: <Dropdown with all locations in the facility> - Mandatory

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6280#issuecomment-1719122752

The public page for assets are not linked with the QR codes. reopening the issue

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3480#issuecomment-1708455416

Need this delivered in next release

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6079#issuecomment-1708453767

to be looked at post deployment of events module

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3454#issuecomment-1699362872

@rithviknishad All prescriptions should be printable. (including admitted patients). This is because the hospitals continue to function using paper files parallel to the digital system. Allowing them to print out the active prescription would help the nurses to add those to the files. To follow a simple model, we can just have 1 format for printing prescriptions. suggestive format: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mF9GDLx-3wgf-ayvcAXPy428lVaZbvO8T8y_LD50nXA/edit?usp=sharing

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5701#issuecomment-1699356018

Also push it to the bottom of the list.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6151#issuecomment-1699298219

@rithviknishad how much work is it? when will you be delivering this?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6154#issuecomment-1699296569

This looks good

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6177#issuecomment-1699294656

Please deliver in priority

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6178#issuecomment-1699277466

adding to wishlist since shifting module is not actively in use currently.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6134#issuecomment-1688436788

Requirement: - [ ] The Respiratory support Tab on patient dashboard (https://care.coronasafe.in/facility/657c32be-d584-476c-9ce2-0412f0e7692e/patient/dbc8c312-3700-4fd5-915e-f53cc28e092a/consultation/8ecb4c49-49d6-4216-87c0-7dc6408d9788/ventilator) to show a timeline of respiratory support provided to the patient. It could be a table showing: Type of respiratory support. | Date and time of start | Date and time of end O2 DD/MM/YYYY, HH:MM AM/PM. DD/MM/YYYY, HH:MM AM/PM At 1 time there can only be 1 type of respiratory support given to the patient. - [ ] Going ahead we will also require the start date and time and type of respiratory support to be plotted on the graphs in the respiratory support tab as vertical lines (start and end).

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/1972#issuecomment-1669672220

No. Please go ahead. We have instances where the nurses edit category on consultation and expect it to change over the patient profile. (While there is a log update) This change is to avoide them from updating it in consultation rather than the latest log update

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5990#issuecomment-1662495741

Discussed with Gigin. Needed clarity on what are the requirements for the dashboard out of this. CARE must be able to send information on 1) How many individual doctors 2) whats the actual resource available taking into account % availability? Eg: If a hospital has the following doctors: Doc 1: 100% Doc 2: 50% Doc 3: 50% Metabase must be able to gain data on 1) No. of individual doctors- 3 2) No. of resource (doctor) available: 2 (1+0.5+0.5)

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5956#issuecomment-1659667819

@Ashesh3 we need this in the next release. It is a priority. Why is it blocked?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5956#issuecomment-1659503556

@Ashesh3 @nihal467 What does the PR https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/5963 do? I dont see the discharge summary automatically getting added to File Upload. How is it supposed to work?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5912#issuecomment-1658057459

Looks good @rithviknishad

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5940#issuecomment-1651920060

@Ashesh3 where are we with this? any ETD

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5363#issuecomment-1635497486

@nihal467 why are we removing this?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care/issues/1200#issuecomment-1602283457

@nihal467 @Ashesh3 Where are we with this Issue? Why dont I see a PR linked?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5237#issuecomment-1538079346

> @aparnacoronasafe There are fields like `Number of chronic diseased dependents`, `Number of aged dependents`, `Estimated contact date`. Should these be removed too from the shifting details of the patient? @cp-Coder yes, please remove

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5390#issuecomment-1521231768

@gigincg I can still see KASP in staging. hence the confusion. If it is disabled, let it stay the same way. No change required. Could you please do the same in staging @mathew-alex so that the confusion doesnt arise. @gigincg In our current requirements, there is no reservation in the field for any scheme. KASP even though an existing scheme acted as a reservation during COVID where the state had mentioned that so many beds must be reserved for KASP. Such a reservation system may only be required during war-time

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5384#issuecomment-1521230744

Issue overlapping with #5385 and #5389

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5373#issuecomment-1520652045

covered in #5389

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5375#issuecomment-1520649038

Suggested some changed in #5384

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/5386#issuecomment-1520644232

@rithviknishad I am so sorry. But I had a change the issue a bit. Could you please make the changes?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5384#issuecomment-1520643763

@cp-Coder please note that I have changed the issue to have both user linked to of the destination and origin facility move shifting to complete for shifts with destination facility in CARE.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5373#issuecomment-1520528796

@Ashesh3 @nihal467

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5237#issuecomment-1519843402

We need to Map medicines using the content. Then we need to connect the medicine search field in prescription module with Medibase database. The user must be able to not just search for medicine, but also type in a content in medicine and all medication with that content must come up in suggestion. Eg: When user types in "Paracetamol" in search, dropdown must not only show the generic Paracetamol Tab etc, but also branded medicine like "Dolo 300mg", "Dolo 650mg" etc. (the main content of Dolo is paracetamol)

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5380#issuecomment-1519449867

This is already dealt with in #4678

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5371#issuecomment-1519447060

This is expected behaviour. Discharged patients must show up for sure. LIVE patients are also shown in the list because otherwise, if one hospital in CARE is not updating patient data properly, and have kept the patient LIVE in CARE even after the patient may have left the hospital, no other hospital will be able to access the patient card later. Since we authenticate with DOB, the process should work fine

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5372#issuecomment-1519445803

This is a Bug. The preferred behavior is, 1) WHEN DESTINATION hospital is in CARE Here the staff of the destination alone must be able to complete a shift. 2) WHEN DESTINATION hospital is OUTSIDE CARE the staff from the origin facility MUST be able to mark a shift as complete Please make the necessary changes

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5373#issuecomment-1519443476

Yes. War- time will have only 2 difference from peace time configuration. 1) 1 additional feature of shifting approval authority (control room) approval. Keeping that as the first steps further simplifies the flow. In peace-time configuration, the flow will start from step two. 2) the destination approval can be done in peace mode by anyone. In war mode, it needs to be restricted to staff from destination hospital or shifting approval authority. If we can have these two setting coded in such a way that is easily switchable, that would be ideal

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5302#issuecomment-1506298284

Add these 2 fields as the first fields in "Respiratory support" section in Log Update

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/2260#issuecomment-1505311948

@Ashesh3 Todo No. 2.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5300#issuecomment-1501901223

@Ashesh3 what is the Expected date of completion for this?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5237#issuecomment-1501714052

Please refer to #5271 also

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5272#issuecomment-1501625151

**Relevance of "recommend discharge"** The reason we have an option to Note "Recommend Discharge" in log update and then a separate "Discharge from CARE" option is because in most cases, the Treating physician would clear the patient for discharge, but the actual discharge may only happen after one of multiple of the following events are done: 1) The patient is on an infusion (medication given through drip) and the doctors may have asked nurse to wait 2-3 hours for drip to complete before sending the patient 2) The patients bill may need to be settled 3) The patient insurance claim process maybe ongoing etc. Therefore the actual discharge (noted in CARE through "discharge from CARE" on patient dashboard) may only be done hours after the treating physician recommends discharge. **To-Do** - [ ] Design a flag for "recommended Discharge" to be visible on the patient list and patient dashboard. the design may be kept consistent with the design for "Action". refer to #5272 . or better the design of actions may be reimagined keeping this use-case also in mind.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5271#issuecomment-1501624582

I think what we could do is convert the prov and final diagnosis into a section Section heading is "diagnosis" with an astrix to show that it is a mandatory field. Inside we could first have provisional diagnosis and diagnosis can be called "confirmed diagnosis"

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5278#issuecomment-1500828929

The items to be added to the discharge summary: - [ ] Date of onset of symptoms - [ ] Weight and Height - [ ] Provisional Diagnosis - [ ] Diagnosis - [ ] ONLY if the patient is COVID positive, the discharge summary should have COVID Disease status and vaccination details. - [ ] PRN Presciption along with normal prescription - [ ] Health status at admission (History of present illness), Ongoing medication at admission (Ongoing medication) - [ ] Allergies - [ ] Blood group - [ ] Discharge details- Discharge reason, Discharge prescription, Discharge PRN Prescription and discharge notes - [ ] Hide Care Patient ID - [ ] Status during consultation - [ ] Procedure - [ ] When any of the fields have no data, DO NOT show the field in discharge summary Leaving out some info because: - Category- since the categorization is loosely based on 4 categories without any clinical definition. It is only a tool used internally and does not have much clinical relevance outside. - Consultation history need not be detailed out in the discharge summary EDIT THE FORMAT OF THE DISCHARGE SUMMARY FOR INFORMATION TO APPEAR IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER ___________________ **Hospital Name Patient Discharge Summary** Name of Patient : Gender: Sex: Age: DOB: Blood Group: Address: Ph. No. **Admission Details** (as a heading) Status during consultation: Date of Admission: IP No: Symptoms at admission: along with date of onset of symptoms Medication history (commorbidities) Health status at admission (History of present illness) **Treatment Summary** (as a heading) Prov Diagnosis: Diagnosis: If COVID Disease status is positive, then show COVID Disease status, COVID Test result Date: COVID Vaccination details. Prescription (Table) PRN Prescription (Table) Investigations conducted (table) Procedure: **Discharge Details** (as a heading) Date of Discharge: Discharge Reason: Discharge prescription (table) Discharge PRN prescription (table) Discharge Note: Treating physician (verified by in consultation form)

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5246#issuecomment-1498899634

I agree @gigincg

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5082#issuecomment-1494329889

The first one @rithviknishad

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5196#issuecomment-1494328651

good to go. The field may be called "Date of Discharge"

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/5168#issuecomment-1486956759

@nihal467 Have you tested this? You need to specifically focus on the following usecases: 1) Patient A is admitted to a normal bed from 1-10 Mar and an ICU FROM 10-15 MAR AND BACK IN A NORMAL BED FROM 15-20TH MAR. Add filter to patent list to get all patient: a) admitted in normal bed on 8th March b) Admitted in normal bed on 13th March c) Admitted in ICU bed on 5th March d) Admitted in ICU bed on 11th March Also see if these can be combined with Age / Gender/ Vaccine filters.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/1787#issuecomment-1478923400

This is not relevant anymore. Pain slider is already improved.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/2732#issuecomment-1478918404

@skks1212 Why is this blocked Shivank?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3437#issuecomment-1478916224

@rabilrbl We need to discuss a few issues before you go ahead with this. I am afraid if we deploy this, multiple users will be trying to control the camera which might cause chaos. Please join EOD and discuss this

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/2091#issuecomment-1454754815

@siva-balan The ideal design is as below: <img width="553" alt="Screenshot 2023-02-24 at 8 14 37 AM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/67050716/221079990-015996a3-1ede-4249-955c-0ab4eca8fcd7.png">

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4867#issuecomment-1442723112

lets discuss in EOD

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/4819#issuecomment-1437065644

this looks good for now. Lets go ahead

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/4844#issuecomment-1437063240

@Pranshu1902 good thought. But nobody is using it now. We may phase it out in the future. Please do not waste effort on this.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4823#issuecomment-1431335148

@nihal467 @khavinshankar I went through the issue. It looks like this is already done. Its safe to close the issue. But please do check out the PRs linked here.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3341#issuecomment-1422703400

@nihal467 Please check the status of the tagged PR. This needs to be done

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3430#issuecomment-1422696862

This needs to be done. @Ashesh3 why did you unassign yourself.? Can somebody else take it up?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3479#issuecomment-1422693822

Dd/mm/yyyy works. Also, if there is already time there retain that too hh:mm format.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4709#issuecomment-1422381831

@nihal467 @cp-Coder This needs to get merged by 13th Feb

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4697#issuecomment-1422141214

@rithviknishad Please check the date of registration/consultation. why is the format like that?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4709#issuecomment-1422113650

@khavinshankar I am very sorry..I think this was covered in an older issue https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4501 that ritvik has already worked on. Can you resolve it and close this?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4770#issuecomment-1420953245

@GokulramGHV Any development on this?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4490#issuecomment-1406281830

@patelaryan7751 Could you commit to a date for this?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4617#issuecomment-1406279181

@gigincg Loosing context here. Right now, we are not capturing the intubation exhumation dates. All we have is the date of log update filed with the info. What was the requirement here again?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/1972#issuecomment-1384206630

Not relevant. The sample management module is not in use. Once we have use, we will make changes accordingly

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/1381#issuecomment-1384144878

yes. this is still relevant

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/2598#issuecomment-1382255070

irrelevant

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/1692#issuecomment-1382248406

This needs to be done but is not a priority item.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/1677#issuecomment-1382247804

This is relevant. however, a lot more scoping needs to be done for V2 of Lab module. Gping to assign it to myself

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/1676#issuecomment-1382245417

irrelevant

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/1502#issuecomment-1382241426

we already got this done.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/1320#issuecomment-1382239570

Not relevant anymore

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/1076#issuecomment-1382239080

@bodhish shall we get this scoped out for the current situation?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/514#issuecomment-1382229275

irrelevant now

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/819#issuecomment-1382225317

Only point No. 3 remains relevant.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/830#issuecomment-1382218605

no relevance anymore

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/855#issuecomment-1382212504

A few more changes would be nice in this. Only for the form when "Recovered" is selected. - Rename "Prescription medication" to "Discharge Prescription" - Change the order to "Reason for discharge", "Discharge Date", "Discharge Prescription including PRN" and "Discharge advice"

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4499#issuecomment-1381577147

A few more changes would be nice in this. Only for the form when "Recovered" is selected. 1) Rename "Prescription medication" to "Discharge Prescription" 2) Change the order to "Reason for discharge", "Discharge Date", "Discharge Prescription including PRN" and "Discharge advice"

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/4573#issuecomment-1381562417

The above issues pointed out by Nihal need to be fixed before deploying. This doesn't meet our quality expectation

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/4573#issuecomment-1381556460

@rithviknishad can you give me an ETD for this one?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4501#issuecomment-1375383649

@cp-Coder Abhuiday, this has come up as an urgent requirement. Could you ship it out in the next two days so that it can be merged to production this week itself?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4499#issuecomment-1375380423

Beg: Even though the field is marked as a mandatory field, the user can submit the form without selecting any option. None comes selected as default. @nihal467 @cp-Coder

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4494#issuecomment-1375374691

@rithviknishad Please note that I have updated the requirement for the specialization field to be a dropdown with search. Earlier, it was specified to be a free text field Please do the needful

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4501#issuecomment-1372246210

@nihal467 @rithviknishad When are we expecting this to go live?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/4378#issuecomment-1370617686

This looks great. Okay...closing the issue. Thanks for pointing it out @rithviknishad :-)

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4491#issuecomment-1370617040

We need that here as well: https://care.coronasafe.in/users/add

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4491#issuecomment-1370609952

@nihal467 checked placement of new sign out option in profile. Looks good to me

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/4444#issuecomment-1370483050

This is the expected behavior. lets not change it

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/4211#issuecomment-1337027498

When 'discharge reason' is selected as expired, "discharge note" must change to "cause of death"

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/1649#issuecomment-1325418138

Also, allow for adding more than 1 youtube video

https://github.com/coronasafe/10bedicu/issues/54#issuecomment-1323457453

@Ashesh3 That's correct Ashesh. Currently, we are using QR codes provided by Gigin. But there is also a side project to build a QR code generator. @gigincg Please give more clarity on QR Codes. Attaching eg of a QR code we use 

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3479#issuecomment-1323349288

@khavinshankar It's not that bed types are altogether removed from care. Earlier we had a more generic bed categorization. Which was removed to introduce the new "Bed Types" as an attribute of any bed within a location. The last admitted to filter must be updated accordingly. @gigincg please comment The bedtype filter is a very useful one and must not be removed completely @nihal467 lets discuss in the EOD. @Ashesh3 @khavinshankar @vigneshhari to participate

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3482#issuecomment-1303053373

@Ashesh3 Great job at summarizing all the changes..:-) However, I think the code is breaking somewhere. Tried testing this patient (https://deploy-preview-3584--care-net.netlify.app/facility/7ab27974-32c8-4e36-bdf9-dbf102524718/patient/cc52390c-ac8a-4af5-9806-f3df7ee1795a/consultation/7037609e-3c25-45ed-bfd8-e01c346cbd45) Multiple log updates are filed, but the review missed badge stays. Please check.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/3584#issuecomment-1262356803

@rithviknishad @Ashesh3 @developedBySJ The review time needs to be stored in the BD and shown in the edit consultation form. A detailed explaination to what needs to be done is added to the issue #1255 Please refer to it

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/3584#issuecomment-1256322647

Clarification on the Issue: **How the Review Feature should work:** - The user must be able to set a review time in the consultation/edit consultation form. Or later on in a log update form. - Once the review time is set, then within that time if a Log Update is not filed for the patient, then the "Review Missed" Badge must appear on the patient card. - When a log update is filed for the patient, the preselected review time must come pre-filled in the 'review after' field in log update. - With every log update filed, the review clock must reset. - If the user, the the log update doesnt edit the 'review after' field, the same interval will continue for review, with the review call resetting with every log update. Eg: I file a 1 hr review in consultation form. I file a log update in half an hr. The log update form will come prefilled with 1hr in review after field. I can choose to edit it to 2 hrs. Then once i save the log update, the clock for review must reset. If no logupdate is filed in another 2 hrs, the "review missed" label must appear on the patient grid in patient list. Then once i file a log update, the clock must be reset again with whatever time is mentioned for review in the latest log update. **Issues in CARE now - to be resolved** - [ ] When I select a review after time in consultation form, and later open the edit consultation form, I see the review after field as blank. I must be able to see the review time i had set previously and also have the option to edit it. - [ ] When i edit the consultation form to add/edit review time, such time must be considered from the time I edited the consultation, and not the time the original consultation was filed. - [ ] When a review is missed, an a "review Missed" flag appears on patient card, the flag must dissappear once I file a log update. - [ ] The log update form must come pre-filled with the previoud review time set (either on the consultation form, or on the previous log update)- the user must have option to edit it. - [ ] The "review missed" flag must come right below the patients name on the patient dashboard as well (https://care.coronasafe.in/facility/7ab27974-32c8-4e36-bdf9-dbf102524718/patient/cc52390c-ac8a-4af5-9806-f3df7ee1795a/consultation/7037609e-3c25-45ed-bfd8-e01c346cbd45)

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/1255#issuecomment-1256315589

An archived file should not be downloadable

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3366#issuecomment-1256268648

You are looking at investigation section. Please look at the prescription

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3619#issuecomment-1254695452

Redundant issue.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/2014#issuecomment-1247645241

Let's keep both editable

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/2747#issuecomment-1242223968

hey. looks great, but when i tested it, the UI was a bit off for me. Maybe because i use a smaller screen <img width="849" alt="Screenshot 2022-09-05 at 1 00 31 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/67050716/188393984-fb945e63-d56e-45b5-b5ef-17fcc8073a4f.png"> 1. Can you improve on the placement of the Delete Icon. 2. Also, for me, another thing thats a bit off is the level of "Search for investigation" and "Notes" is never aligned. I know its also because the height of the investigation labels are different from the input fields. But can you do something to improve it?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/3500#issuecomment-1236642823

@skks1212 This looks awesome!!!

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/3500#issuecomment-1236634296

Another issue filed to take care of this. #3429

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/1716#issuecomment-1234305258

The investigation module is currently seeded with a list of tests. Those tests are here at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hN13p-BDbb1Pkl3a8tcVdWFsFxncju2QPfeOEkKh51E/edit?usp=sharing In investigations, as you can see the tests are also grouped (mentioned in Tab 2 above) It would be great to give user the option to select a group, whereby all tests in the group must come up. This is an advanced feature. Placement: Above prescriptions in consultation form

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3435#issuecomment-1234301980

@skks1212 Hey. can you give me a quick update on the progress here?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3437#issuecomment-1231701786

This is good. "general instructions"

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/3440#issuecomment-1231663454

Tamil: டிஜிட்டல் கருவிகளைப் பயன்படுத்தி பொது சுகாதார சேவைகளின் தரம் மற்றும் அணுகல்தன்மையை தொடர்ந்து மேம்படுத்துவதே எங்கள் குறிக்கோள்.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3455#issuecomment-1231578644

kannada: ಡಿಜಿಟಲ್ ಉಪಕರಣಗಳನ್ನು ಬಳಸಿಕೊಂಡು ಸಾರ್ವಜನಿಕ ಆರೋಗ್ಯ ಸೇವೆಗಳ ಗುಣಮಟ್ಟ ಮತ್ತು ಪ್ರವೇಶವನ್ನು ನಿರಂತರವಾಗಿ ಸುಧಾರಿಸುವುದು ನಮ್ಮ ಗುರಿಯಾಗಿದೆ.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3455#issuecomment-1231410004

More thought: Since 5-para monitors and ventilators and integrated directly to the device, isnt it better to keep both of those as separate forms. Do we have the bandwidth to develop and maintain 5 forms for log updates?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3453#issuecomment-1231401873

But 2 separate values appearing on a patient file may confuse the user. Let me take this back to Dr. Athul and try and make more sense.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3429#issuecomment-1228600026

Clarification: Suggestive design <img width="734" alt="Screenshot 2022-08-26 at 8 18 31 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/67050716/186932487-3ee4e953-9a67-469d-8abc-ea22122b2e9c.png">

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3432#issuecomment-1228594404

Clarification: A suggestive design would be something like this <img width="734" alt="Screenshot 2022-08-26 at 8 18 31 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/67050716/186932068-ae57c78e-6717-40b5-834f-ed5c93369a8d.png">

https://github.com/coronasafe/care/issues/986#issuecomment-1228592336

@khavinshankar DONOT close the issue. Even though patient page is redisigned, The bed no. badges are not added . Please be very careful to read through the issue to see if all the tasks are completed. The bed badges with the above specifications needs to be added to the new patient UI.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3261#issuecomment-1228147062

Marathi: डिजिटल साधनांचा वापर करून सार्वजनिक आरोग्य सेवांची गुणवत्ता आणि सुलभता सतत सुधारणे हे आमचे ध्येय आहे.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3455#issuecomment-1225820700

> @aparnacoronasafe > >  > > we should be changing here too right? @nihal467 @skks1212 Yes. You need to make change suggested above by nihal too.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/3440#issuecomment-1225699953

@nihal467 let's approve this PR. Lets make a separate issue to change in the places you pointed out.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/3434#issuecomment-1225175927

Issue resolved by Gigin

https://github.com/coronasafe/dashboard/issues/203#issuecomment-1223885334

Malayalm : ഡിജിറ്റൽ ടൂളുകൾ ഉപയോഗിച്ച് പൊതുജനാരോഗ്യ സേവനങ്ങളുടെ ഗുണനിലവാരവും പ്രവേശനക്ഷമതയും തുടർച്ചയായി മെച്ചപ്പെടുത്തുകയാണ് ഞങ്ങളുടെ ലക്ഷ്യം.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3455#issuecomment-1223709296

@developedBySJ please do work on the above issue, or unassign yourself so that someone else can work.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3261#issuecomment-1223703623

https://github.com/coronasafe/care/issues/989 @vigneshhari Created one in care repo. Is there anything to be done on the FE? Should we close this issue?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care/issues/980#issuecomment-1223700853

@vigneshhari can we have an issue for that?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care/issues/980#issuecomment-1223543620

@rithviknishad let me get help on this. @rithviknishad this needs to be a customizable component. With each deployment, there must be option to change it. The default will be the above phrase.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3455#issuecomment-1223537438

@arpancodes yes. total score will be sum of all subscores for a particular pressure sore. There will be one score for each of the pressure sores on the body @gigincg @nihal467 Yes, we need a redesign. I was imagining the OUSH score to appear in a floating window against each selected body part. It would be nice if someone can create a mockup design and we can start a discussion from there.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3432#issuecomment-1223536122

@vigneshhari Currently we do have a Username availability check happening on the UI itself. That said that the username is available. We need to make that availability check more accurate. Can you guys file an issue? @vigneshhari @gigincg @khavinshankar ? and then close this issue?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care/issues/980#issuecomment-1223533971

@cp-Coder Thanks for pointing it out. I will be more careful in checking if an issue is already filed.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care/issues/983#issuecomment-1223532636

@arpancodes I see changes requested. Please look into this and try closing it this week

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/3356#issuecomment-1223531792

@skks1212 Yes please!!

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3433#issuecomment-1223530442

@developedBySJ The design looks great. Let push this out ASAP @gigincg @bodhish @nihal467

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/3324#issuecomment-1220937080

Blocked since the relevant fields in consultation has not been added yet.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3437#issuecomment-1220865414

@gigincg I dont see this in staging!

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3105#issuecomment-1220825488

@arpancodes Can we close this ASAP?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/3356#issuecomment-1220767292

Cant make sense of this either. Closing this issue

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/2011#issuecomment-1220673233

I am revising this requirement and breaking down the same to smaller issues

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/2212#issuecomment-1220644375

@gigincg . We MUST allow both admission date and decision after consultation. Why would we disallow it?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/2747#issuecomment-1220615724

Thanks Nihal. @gigincg point 1 above

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3413#issuecomment-1216666586

> Staff can create users with their own home facility as home facility. Manipur needed District Admin intervention for migration existing users. I don't see the need for such an intervention in the future @gigincg tested in staging. Currently staff is unable to assign home facility @nihal467 can you please test too

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3413#issuecomment-1216245003

@vigneshhari @gigincg

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3413#issuecomment-1216200642

@arpancodes this is also resolved. Thank you

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/2283#issuecomment-1213051695

@arpancodes This is already taken care of. Thanks for bringing this to my notice. Closing the issue

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/2942#issuecomment-1213050771

@skks1212 @patelaryan7751 I have broken this issue down further in the following issues #3332 Allergies #3333 Vaccine #3335 Blood group #3336 Height weight #3338 Family details

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/2738#issuecomment-1213048167

A quick clarification on the content of the Patient registration form and consultation form <img width="932" alt="Screenshot 2022-08-12 at 5 22 32 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/67050716/184351271-1a9feb50-2550-43f0-a4b0-491af4f2349a.png">

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3331#issuecomment-1213046249

A quick clarification on the content of the Patient registration form and consultation form <img width="932" alt="Screenshot 2022-08-12 at 5 22 32 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/67050716/184351022-bb886b89-e4b3-45c1-b0e2-6e15148ceccb.png">

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3332#issuecomment-1213045029

A quick clarification on the content of the Patient registration form and consultation form ![Uploading Screenshot 2022-08-12 at 5.22.32 PM.png…]()

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3333#issuecomment-1213044392

A quick clarification on the content of the Patient registration form and consultation form <img width="932" alt="Screenshot 2022-08-12 at 5 22 32 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/67050716/184350633-8bc22ba3-03e8-4909-a050-ac0e64446604.png">

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3335#issuecomment-1213042680

A quick clarification on the content of the Patient registration form and consultation form <img width="932" alt="Screenshot 2022-08-12 at 5 22 32 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/67050716/184350480-764cd785-a8ab-49fc-9451-7e620ac779c6.png">

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3336#issuecomment-1213041727

Clarification on the revised content in patient registration form and consultation form <img width="932" alt="Screenshot 2022-08-12 at 5 22 32 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/67050716/184350214-ef9ba8ce-98e3-42e2-a328-83e8a05e6b93.png">

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3361#issuecomment-1213040206

@arpancodes Family details must go to the "Health details in consultation form

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3341#issuecomment-1213039126

@arpancodes Yes, please rename the existing section in patient registration form to "COVID Specific Info" However, for your clarification please look at the below <img width="932" alt="Screenshot 2022-08-12 at 5 22 32 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/67050716/184349491-ec8f4ede-cfb0-477e-8029-a6758f9a113e.png">

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3341#issuecomment-1213036761

@arpancodes <img width="932" alt="Screenshot 2022-08-12 at 5 22 32 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/67050716/184348616-eb6513d1-ef10-4a02-8283-0d6d62296893.png"> There are 2 forms: 1: Patient registration form to have personal details of patients and COVID specific details 2: Cnsultation form is to have Medical history, health details, consultation

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3338#issuecomment-1213032672

@Ashesh3 That's great.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3325#issuecomment-1212960404

Preserving the COVID Specific details, made edits to #3341 I have further broken down the issues to have each of the points above as one separate issue. Since for many fields, more details have to be added in, I thought its best to break things down.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3331#issuecomment-1210963624

For medical purposes, COVID ID is not going to be very relevant. I checked it with Dr. Athul as well @gigincg

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3333#issuecomment-1210954158

@gigincg contact tracing for covid has become a thing of the past. Therefore, even though i recommend keeping the covid positive label, i do not support having the label for "contact with confirmed carrier"

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3325#issuecomment-1210951941

Agreed. Edited issue to call this section "COVID Specific Details"

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3341#issuecomment-1210940308

The Tab may be called "Live Monitoring" Let's have a list of various hospitals on top like the various tabs on the patient dashboard for "Update", "Summary", "medicines, etc. as the user clicks on various tabs, all cameras from the hospital must show up. The Feed must show the bed no. its looking at. the default view must be a "Patient view" for any bed.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/2091#issuecomment-1208184546

I completely agree you on the COVID , non covid option. Lets hide it for now. I will work on studying the scope of creating various clinical option like covid, non covid. So let's go ahead and hide it for now

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/3341#issuecomment-1207245532